Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Activity Limitations, Use of Assistive Devices, and Mortality and Clinical Events in 25 High-Income, Middle-Income, and Low-Income Countries: An Analysis of the Pure Study Publisher Pubmed



Joundi RA1 ; Hu B2, 3 ; Rangarajan S1 ; Leong DP1 ; Islam S4 ; Smith EE5 ; Mirrakhimov E6 ; Seron P7 ; Alhabib KF8 ; Assembekov B9 ; Chifamba J10 ; Yusuf R11 ; Khatib R12 ; Felix C13 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Joundi RA1
  2. Hu B2, 3
  3. Rangarajan S1
  4. Leong DP1
  5. Islam S4
  6. Smith EE5
  7. Mirrakhimov E6
  8. Seron P7
  9. Alhabib KF8
  10. Assembekov B9
  11. Chifamba J10
  12. Yusuf R11
  13. Khatib R12
  14. Felix C13
  15. Yusufali A14
  16. Mohammadifard N15
  17. Rosengren A16
  18. Oguz A17
  19. Iqbal R18
  20. Yeates K19
  21. Avezum A20
  22. Kruger I21
  23. Anjana R22
  24. Pvm L23
  25. Gupta R24
  26. Zatonska K25
  27. Barbarash O26
  28. Pelliza E27
  29. Rammohan K28
  30. Li M2, 3
  31. Li X2, 3
  32. Ismail R29
  33. Lopezjaramillo P30
  34. Evans M31
  35. Odonnell M32
  36. Yusuf S1
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, ON, Canada
  2. 2. Medical Research and Biometrics Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China
  3. 3. National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  4. 4. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  5. 5. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  6. 6. I K Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
  7. 7. Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
  8. 8. King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  9. 9. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  10. 10. University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
  11. 11. Independent University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  12. 12. Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI, United States
  13. 13. Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
  14. 14. Tamani Foundation, Matemwe, Tanzania
  15. 15. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  16. 16. Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  17. 17. Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkiye
  18. 18. The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  19. 19. Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  20. 20. International Research Center, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz and UNISA, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  21. 21. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
  22. 22. Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
  23. 23. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  24. 24. Eternal Heart Care Centre and Research Institute, Rajasthan, India
  25. 25. Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  26. 26. Kuzbass Cardiology Centre, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
  27. 27. Estudios Clinicos Latinoamerica, Santa Fe, Argentina
  28. 28. Government Medical College, Kerala, India
  29. 29. Universiti Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  30. 30. University of Santander, Santander, Colombia
  31. 31. Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
  32. 32. University of Galway, Galway, Ireland

Source: The Lancet Published:2024


Abstract

Background: The focus of most epidemiological studies has been mortality or clinical events, with less information on activity limitations related to basic daily functions and their consequences. Standardised data from multiple countries at different economic levels in different regions of the world on activity limitations and their associations with clinical outcomes are sparse. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of activity limitations and use of assistive devices and the association of limitations with adverse outcomes in 25 countries grouped by different economic levels. Methods: In this analysis, we obtained data from individuals in 25 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study (175 660 participants). In the PURE study, individuals aged 35–70 years who intended to continue living in their current home for a further 4 years were invited to complete a questionnaire on activity limitations. Participant follow-up was planned once every 3 years either by telephone or in person. The activity limitation screen consisted of questions on self-reported difficulty with walking, grasping, bending, seeing close, seeing far, speaking, hearing, and use of assistive devices (gait, vision, and hearing aids). We estimated crude prevalence of self-reported activity limitations and use of assistive devices, and prevalence standardised by age and sex. We used logistic regression to additionally adjust prevalence for education and socioeconomic factors and to estimate the probability of activity limitations and assistive devices by age, sex, and country income. We used Cox frailty models to evaluate the association between each activity limitation with mortality and clinical events (cardiovascular disease, heart failure, pneumonia, falls, and cancer). The PURE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03225586. Findings: Between Jan 12, 2001, and May 6, 2019, 175 584 individuals completed at least one question on the activity limitation questionnaire (mean age 50·6 years [SD 9·8]; 103 625 [59%] women). Of the individuals who completed all questions, mean follow-up was 10·7 years (SD 4·4). The most common self-reported activity limitations were difficulty with bending (23 921 [13·6%] of 175 515 participants), seeing close (22 532 [13·4%] of 167 801 participants), and walking (22 805 [13·0%] of 175 554 participants); prevalence of limitations was higher with older age and among women. The prevalence of all limitations standardised by age and sex, with the exception of hearing, was highest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, and this remained consistent after adjustment for socioeconomic factors. The use of gait, visual, and hearing aids was lowest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, particularly among women. The prevalence of seeing close limitation was four times higher (6257 [16·5%] of 37 926 participants vs 717 [4·0%] of 18 039 participants) and the prevalence of seeing far limitation was five times higher (4003 [10·6%] of 37 923 participants vs 391 [2·2%] of 18 038 participants) in low-income countries than in high-income countries, but the prevalence of glasses use in low-income countries was half that in high-income countries. Walking limitation was most strongly associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·32 [95% CI 1·25–1·39]) and most consistently associated with other clinical events, with other notable associations observed between seeing far limitation and mortality, grasping limitation and cardiovascular disease, bending limitation and falls, and between speaking limitation and stroke. Interpretation: The global prevalence of activity limitations is substantially higher in women than men and in low-income countries and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries, coupled with a much lower use of gait, visual, and hearing aids. Strategies are needed to prevent and mitigate activity limitations globally, with particular emphasis on low-income countries and women. Funding: Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Other Related Docs
40. Effects of Physical Activity on Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Case-Control Study, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2016)