Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effects of Camelina Oil Supplementation on Lipid Profile and Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Dose‒Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Publisher Pubmed



Jalili C1 ; Talebi S2 ; Mehrabani S3 ; Bagheri R4 ; Wong A5 ; Amirian P6 ; Zarpoosh M6 ; Ghoreishy SM2 ; Kermani MAH7 ; Moradi S8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Medical Biology Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Science, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Exercise Physiology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health and Human Performance, Marymount University, Arlington, VA, United States
  6. 6. General Practitioner, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (KUMS), Kermanshah, Iran
  7. 7. Clinical Tuberculosis and Epidemiology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Nutritional Sciences Department, School of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Source: Lipids in Health and Disease Published:2022


Abstract

Background: This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. Methods: Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to July 1, 2022. RTCs with an intervention duration of less than 2 weeks, without a placebo group, and those that used COS in combination with another supplement were excluded. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were pooled by applying a random-effects model, while validated methods examined sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity, and publication bias. Results: Seven eligible RCTs, including 428 individuals, were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that COS significantly improved total cholesterol in studies lasting more than 8 weeks and utilizing dosages lower than 30 g/d compared to the placebo group. The results of fractional polynomial modeling indicated that there were nonlinear dose–response relations between the dose of COS and absolute mean differences in low-density cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and total cholesterol, but not triglycerides. It appears that the greatest effect of COS oil occurs at the dosage of 20 g/day. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicates that COS may reduce cardiovascular disease risk by improving lipid profile markers. Based on the results of this study, COS at dosages lower than 30 g/d may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for lipid control. Further RCTs with longer COS durations are warranted to expand on these results. © 2022, The Author(s).
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
23. Effect of Stevia on Blood Glucose and Hba1c: A Meta-Analysis, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2024)