Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
In-Vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder Forms



Rismanchian M1 ; Khodaeian N2 ; Bahramian L1 ; Fathi M3 ; Sadeghialiabadi H4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Implant Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Dental Materials Research Center and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Biomaterials Research Group, Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Published:2013

Abstract

The cytotoxicity of the biomaterials is a key issue that should be addressed prior to pre-clinical applications. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the cytotoxixity of two forms of bioactive glasses: nanopowder and micropowder. Human HGF1-PI53 gingival fibroblast cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/ mL concentrations of the two bioactive glasses via MTT assay. The results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically signifcant. Results showed that two bioactive glasses had statistically signifcant differences at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/mL concentrations (p-value < 0.05) and there was no correlation between time and cell cytotoxicity of bioactive glasses (p-value > 0.05), using t-test and Spearman's correlation coefficient. We conclude that that cytotoxicity of nanopowder bioactive glass at concentrations ≤ 2 mg/mL was similar to micropowder bioactive glass at 24 and 48 h, however, it is more cytotoxic at concentrations ≥ 5 mg/mL in the first 48 h of applications. © 2013 by School of Pharmacy.
Other Related Docs
12. Novel Nanocomposite Coating for Dental Implant Applications in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine (2012)
14. Nanobiomaterials in Periodontal Tissue Engineering, Nanobiomaterials in Hard Tissue Engineering: Applications of Nanobiomaterials (2016)
20. Biocompatibility Evaluation of Bioglass Nanoparticles to Chondrocyte Cells by Isothermal Microcalorimetry, 2010 17th Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering, ICBME 2010 - Proceedings (2010)