Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Association Between Dietary Inflammatory Index and Psychological Profile in Adults Publisher Pubmed



Salarimoghaddam A1, 2 ; Keshteli AH3, 4 ; Afshar H5 ; Esmaillzadeh A2, 6, 7 ; Adibi P4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  4. 4. Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Clinical Nutrition Published:2019


Abstract

Background & aims: Limited data are available on the association of inflammatory potential of the diet and odds of psychological disorders. We investigated the association between adherence to a pro-inflammatory diet, as measured by Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), and odds of psychological disorders. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, dietary intakes of 3363 Iranian adult participants were collected using a validated Dish-based 106-item Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (DS-FFQ). DII score was calculated based on participants’ dietary intakes obtained from DS-FFQ. The Iranian validated version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used to assess psychological disorders. For depression and anxiety, scores of 8 or more on either subscale were considered as psychological disorders and scores of 0–7 were defined as “normal”. In terms of psychological distress, the score of 4 or more was defined as psychological distress. Results: Overall, 28% (n = 943) of study participants had depression, 13.3% (n = 448) were affected by anxiety and 22.6% (n = 760) by psychological distress. After controlling for potential confounders, individuals in the highest quintile of DII score had higher scores of depression (6.56 ± 0.16 vs. 5.48 ± 0.16; P < 0.001), anxiety (3.85 ± 0.17 vs. 3.09 ± 0.17; P = 0.006), and psychological distress (2.42 ± 0.13 vs. 1.77 ± 0.13; P = 0.001), compared with those in the lowest quintile. Participants in the top quintile of DII score had greater odds of depression (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.30–2.60), anxiety (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.07–2.67), and psychological distress (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.20–2.46) than those in the bottom quintile. Conclusions: We found that adherence to a pro-inflammatory diet was positively associated with psychological disorders. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Other Related Docs
11. Psychological Disorders and Dietary Patterns by Reduced-Rank Regression, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2019)
17. Dietary Acid Load in Relation to Depression and Anxiety in Adults, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (2020)
33. The Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index and Cognitive Function in Iranian Elders, Recent Advances in Food, Nutrition and Agriculture (2024)
38. Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Common Psychological Disorders, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016)