Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluating the Effect of Different Combination of Impression and Pouring Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Crowns; [Evaluacion Del Efecto De Diferentes Combinaciones De Materiales De Impresion Y Vertido En La Adaptacion Marginal E Interna De Las Coronas De Circonio.] Publisher



Ghodsi S1 ; Mogharrabi S2 ; Jalali S2 ; Ahmadzadeh A2 ; Valizadeh S3, 4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Prosthodontics department, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  3. 3. Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Oral Research Published:2020


Abstract

Purpose: Two important factors in dental prosthesis are making an accurate impression and producing a suitable cast which represents the exact relationship between prepared tooth and oral structures. This study, aimed to investigate the effects of different combinations of impression and pouring materials on marginal and internal adaptation of premolar zirconia crowns. Material and Methods: Forty maxillary premolars were prepared considering round shoulder finish line. The impressions were made either by additional (Panasil) or condensation (Speedex) silicon, and poured by two different types of gypsum materials (Siladent or GC gypsum) (N=10). Zirconia crowns were fabricated using a CAD-CAM system. The crowns were cemented, and the samples were cut in bucco-lingual direction. Marginal and internal gaps were measured by stereomicroscope (×25). Results: The mean marginal gaps for Pansil-Siladent, Panasil-GC, Speedex-Siladent, and Speedex-GC were 141 μm, 143 μm, 131 μm, and 137 μm respectively. The internal gaps were 334 μm, 292 μm, 278 μm, and 257 μm respectively. The independent T-Student test showed no significant differences in average marginal or internal gap among various impression and gypsum materials or their interactions (p>0.05). Two-way ANOVA test showed no significant differences in maximum marginal or internal gap among various impression and gypsum materials and their interactions (p>0.05). Conclusion: The present study revealed no statistically significant difference in marginal/internal gap among crowns prepared using different combinations of impression-pouring materials evaluated. © 2020, Universidad de Concepcion. All rights reserved.