Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review Publisher



Niazi S1 ; Jimenezgarcia M2, 3 ; Findl O4 ; Gatzioufas Z5 ; Doroodgar F1, 6 ; Shahriari MH7 ; Javadi MA8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 1336616351, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  3. 3. Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium
  4. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, 1140, Austria
  5. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland
  6. 6. Negah Aref Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 1544914599, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 1971653313, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Ophthalmic Research Center, Labbafinezhad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 19395-4741, Tehran, Iran

Source: Diagnostics Published:2023


Abstract

The remarkable recent advances in managing keratoconus, the most common corneal ectasia, encouraged researchers to conduct further studies on the disease. Despite the abundance of information about keratoconus, debates persist regarding the detection of mild cases. Early detection plays a crucial role in facilitating less invasive treatments. This review encompasses corneal data ranging from the basic sciences to the application of artificial intelligence in keratoconus patients. Diagnostic systems utilize automated decision trees, support vector machines, and various types of neural networks, incorporating input from various corneal imaging equipment. Although the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into corneal imaging devices may take time, their popularity in clinical practice is increasing. Most of the studies reviewed herein demonstrate a high discriminatory power between normal and keratoconus cases, with a relatively lower discriminatory power for subclinical keratoconus. © 2023 by the authors.
Other Related Docs
16. Updates on Keratoconus Diagnosis, Keratoconus: Optical and Surgical Management (2024)
21. Ai-Driven Keratoconus Detection: Integrating Medical Insights for Enhanced Diagnosis, 11th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics# ICRoM 2023 (2023)
22. Iol’S for Visual Rehabilitation in Stable Keratocounus, Keratoconus: Current and Future State-of-the-Art (2021)
30. Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: A Major Review, Journal of Ophthalmology (2024)
32. Sirius®, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
33. Topographic Properties of the Cornea in Welders, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2022)
34. Can Oct Pachymetry Identify Keratoconus Suspects?, Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology (2015)
36. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
38. Characteristics and Associations of Keratoconus Patients, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye (2015)
44. Effect of Belin-Ambrosio Deviation Index on 2-Year Refractive Outcomes of Prk, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (2024)