Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Zadegan SA¹ ; Abedi A¹ ; Jazayeri SB¹ ; Nasiri Bonaki H¹ ; Jazayeri SB¹ ; Vaccaro AR² ; Rahimimovaghar V¹ Show Affiliations
Source: World Neurosurgery Published:2017

Abstract

Objective Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been commonly used as a graft substitute in spinal fusion. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning on life-threatening complications of recombinant human BMPs (rhBMPs) in cervical spine fusion in 2008, their off-label use has been continued. This investigation aimed to review the evidence for the use of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 in anterior cervical spine fusions. Methods A comprehensive search was performed through Ovid (MEDLINE), PubMed, and Embase. The risk of bias assessment was according to the recommended criteria by the Cochrane Back and Neck group and MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies). A wide array of radiographic and clinical outcomes including the adverse events were collated. Results Eighteen articles (1 randomized and 17 nonrandomized) were eligible for inclusion. The fusion rate was higher with use of rhBMP in most studies and our meta-analysis of the pooled data from 4782 patients confirmed this finding (odds ratio, 5.45; P < 0.00001). Altogether, the rhBMP and control groups were comparable in patient-reported outcomes. However, most studies tended to show a significantly higher incidence of overall complication rate, dysphagia/dysphonia, cervical swelling, readmission, wound complications, neurologic complications, and ossification. Conclusions Application of rhBMPs in cervical spine fusion yields a significantly higher fusion rate with similar patient-reported outcomes, yet increased risk of life-threatening complications. Thus, we do not recommend the use of rhBMP in anterior cervical fusions. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.