Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):

Share By

Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior Publisher

Kargozar S¹ ; Hamzehlou S² ; Baino F³

Source: Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics Published:2018

Abstract

Bioceramics is an extraordinarily versatile class of specially designed ceramics for the repair and reconstruction of diseased or damaged parts of the body. Based on their response to the biological environment, bioceramics are commonly classified into three major families, i.e., almost-inert (e.g., alumina and zirconia), bioactive (e.g., bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics), and resorbable ceramics (e.g., calcium phosphates). Their behavior in contact with biological fluids, cells, and tissues rules their suitability for a range of applications, which include bearings of joint prostheses, bone fillers, porous scaffolds, and coatings. This chapter discusses the effects of the biological environment on ceramics in the light of available in vitro and in vivo studies. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Related Docs

View other Related Docs

1. Bioactive Glasses: Sprouting Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering, Trends in Biotechnology (2018)

2. Bioactive Glasses and Calcium Phosphates, Biomaterials for Oral and Dental Tissue Engineering (2017)

3. Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?, Journal of Functional Biomaterials (2018)

Experts (# of related papers)

View all Related Experts

Mahmoud Azami (2)

Nasrin Lotfibakhshaiesh (2)

Other Related Docs

4. Strontium- and Cobalt-Substituted Bioactive Glasses Seeded With Human Umbilical Cord Perivascular Cells to Promote Bone Regeneration Via Enhanced Osteogenic and Angiogenic Activities, Acta Biomaterialia (2017)

5. Investigation of Osteoinductive Effects of Different Compositions of Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering, ASAIO Journal (2017)

6. Silk Fibroin/Hydroxyapatite Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering, Biotechnology Advances (2018)

7. Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (Mbgs) in Cancer Therapy: Full of Hope and Promise, Materials Letters (2019)

8. Synthesis, Physico-Chemical and Biological Characterization of Strontium and Cobalt Substituted Bioactive Glasses for Bone Tissue Engineering, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids (2016)

9. Fabrication of Bioactive Glass Coating on Pure Titanium by Sol-Dip Method: Dental Applications, Dental Materials Journal (2021)

10. Development and Characterization of a Bioglass/Chitosan Composite As an Injectable Bone Substitute, Carbohydrate Polymers (2017)

11. Synergistic Combination of Bioactive Glasses and Polymers for Enhanced Bone Tissue Regeneration, Materials Today: Proceedings (2018)

12. Effect of Addition of Titanium on Structural, Mechanical and Biological Properties of 45S5 Glass-Ceramic, Ceramics International (2018)

13. Bone Regeneration in Rat Using a Gelatin/Bioactive Glass Nanocomposite Scaffold Along With Endothelial Cells (Huvecs), International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology (2018)

14. Bioactive Glasses and Glass/Polymer Composites for Neuroregeneration: Should We Be Hopeful?, Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (2020)

15. Selective Contribution of Bioactive Glasses to Molecular and Cellular Pathways, ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering (2020)

16. Synthesis and Physico-Chemical Characterization of Fluoride (F)- a Nd Silver (Ag)-Substituted Sol-Gel Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses, Biomedical Glasses (2019)

17. Osteogenic Potential of Stem Cells-Seeded Bioactive Nanocomposite Scaffolds: A Comparative Study Between Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Bone, Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly, and Adipose Tissue, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials (2018)

18. Nanostructured Monticellite: An Emerging Player in Tissue Engineering, Materials Today: Proceedings (2018)

19. Applying Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Technique Accelerates Fabricating Complex Biphasic Calcium Phosphate-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration, Journal of Advanced Research (2022)

20. Effectiveness of Reinforced 45S5 Bioglass With Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia and Iron in the Regeneration of Rabbit Calvarial Defects, Acta Veterinaria Eurasia (2022)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F. "Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior." Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics, vol. , no. , 2018, pp. 407-437.
APA	Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F (2018). Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior. Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics, (), 407-437.
Chicago	Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F. "Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior." Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics , no. (2018): 407-437.
Harvard	Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F (2018) 'Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior', Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics, (), pp. 407-437.
Vancouver	Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F. Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior. Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics. 2018;():407-437.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Kargozar S and Hamzehlou S and Baino F}, title = {Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior}, journal = {Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics}, volume = {}, number = {}, pages = {407-437}, year = {2018} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Kargozar S AU - Hamzehlou S AU - Baino F TI - Effects of the Biological Environment on Ceramics: Degradation, Cell Response, and in Vivo Behavior JO - Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics VL - IS - SP - 407 EP - 437 PY - 2018 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Abstract