Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effects of Melissa Officinalis (Lemon Balm) on Cardio-Metabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Heshmati J1 ; Morvaridzadeh M1 ; Sepidarkish M2 ; Fazelian S3 ; Rahimlou M4 ; Omidi A1 ; Palmowski A5 ; Asadi A6 ; Shidfar F6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Nutritional Science, School of Nutritional Science and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
  3. 3. Clinical Research Development Unit, Ayatollah Kashani Hospital, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Nutrition, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  6. 6. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Phytotherapy Research Published:2020


Abstract

Recent evidence indicates a beneficial effect of Melissa officinalis (MO) intake on several chronic diseases. However, the effects of MO intake have not yet been systematically reviewed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of MO intake and focused on several cardiometabolic outcomes. MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for MO-RCTs evaluating cardiometabolic outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated the pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) between intervention and control groups. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in RCTs. Seven RCTs were finally deemed eligible. MO intake was associated with a reduced total cholesterol (TC) (SMD: −0.26; 95% CI: −0.52, −0.01; I2 = 13.7%; k = 6) and a reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) (SMD: −0.56; 95% CI: −0.85, −0.27; I2 = 00.0%; k = 3). MO intake was not associated with statistically significant changes in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, diastolic blood pressure, high sensitivity c-reactive protein levels, fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, insulin or high-density lipoprotein levels. No serious adverse events were reported. The risk of bias was high in a considerable amount of studies. Our study suggests that MO is a safe supplement with beneficial effects on TC and SBP. However, the findings of our study must be seen in the light of major limitations such as a low number of included studies and a serious risk of bias. High-quality RCTs are needed for firm conclusions concerning the effects of MO on cardiometabolic outcomes. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs