Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Salivary Noncoding Rna in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Koopaie M1 ; Kolahdooz S2 ; Fatahzadeh M3 ; Aleedawi Z4, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. USERN, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, United States
  4. 4. School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Dentist, Private Dental Clinic, Beirut, Lebanon

Source: European Journal of Clinical Investigation Published:2022


Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is considered one of the most deadly malignancies, primarily because of its diagnostic challenges. We performed a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of noncoding salivary RNAs in pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Methods: Our investigation involved pertinent studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LIVIVO, Ovid and also the Google Scholar search engine. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated, as were positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The summary receiver-operating characteristics and area under the curve were plotted and assessed. Results: This meta-analysis and systematic review involved and examined five studies that contained 145 study units with a total of 2731 subjects (1465 pancreatic cancer patients versus 1266 noncancer controls). The pooled specificity, sensitivity, NLR, PLR and DOR were 0.783 (95% CI: 0.759–0.805), 0.829 (95% CI: 0.809–0.848), 0.309 (95% CI: 0.279–0.343), 3.386 (95% CI: 2.956–3.879) and 18.403 (95% CI: 14.753–22.954), respectively, with the area under the curve (AUC) equal to 0.882. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the saliva type (unstimulated and stimulated), mean age of patients, sample size, type of control, serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) level and type of salivary noncoding RNA (microRNA (miRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA)). Conclusions: The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that noncoding RNA biomarkers in the stimulated saliva could be a promising approach for accurate pancreatic cancer diagnosis in the early stages. © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.
Other Related Docs
9. A Review of Salivary Biomarkers in Breast Cancer, Current Women's Health Reviews (2023)
10. Prediction of Intraperitoneal Adhesions in Repeated Cesarean Sections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2023)
37. Principles of Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics, Precision Medicine in Clinical Practice (2022)